Paper detail

Feature Learning in Linear-Width Two-Layer Networks: Two vs. One Step of Gradient Descent

We study feature learning in two-layer neural networks within the linear-width regime, where the number of hidden neurons, sample size, and input dimension scale proportionally. While recent work has analyzed feature learning via a single step of gradient descent, such updates are fundamentally limited: they are approximately rank-one, capturing only a single direction, and require the target function to have an information exponent of one. In this paper, we go beyond one-step updates to provide a full characterization of the features learned during the second step of gradient descent with step-sizes $η_1 \asymp N^{α_1}$ and $η_2 \asymp N^{α_2}$ for $α_1, α_2 \in [0,0.5)$. We derive a sharp spectral characterization of the updated weights, demonstrating they behave as a spiked random matrix with multiple outliers, each corresponding to a learned direction. We show that the number of these outliers is determined by the scaling parameters $α_1$ and $α_2$ through $\lfloor \frac{α_2}{1/2 - α_1} \rfloor$. Furthermore, by analyzing the alignment between these learned directions and the target function, we identify a qualitative gap between training with independent versus reused batches. While independent batches restrict learning to directions with an information exponent of one, batch reuse enables the second update to capture directions even when the information exponent exceeds one, under the condition that $α_1, α_2$ are chosen properly. This confirms that the benefits of batch reuse, previously observed in finite-width regimes, persist in the high-dimensional linear-width limit. By characterizing these early-phase spectral transitions, our work establishes a tractable mathematical framework for studying optimization and feature learning phenomenology in modern overparameterized networks.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.