Paper detail

Feasible Region: an Actuation-Aware Extension of the Support Region

In legged locomotion the projection of the robot Center of Mass (CoM) being inside the convex hull of the contact points is a commonly accepted sufficient condition to achieve static balancing. However, some of these configurations cannot be realized because the joint torques required to sustain them would be above their limits (actuation limits). In this manuscript we rule out such configurations and define the Feasible Region, a revisited support region that guarantees both global static stability in the sense of tipover and slippage avoidance and of existence of a set of joint-torques that are able to sustain the robot body weight. We show that the feasible region can be employed for the selection of feasible footholds and CoM trajectories to achieve static locomotion on rough terrains, also in presence of load intensive tasks. Key results of our approach include the efficiency in the computation of the feasible region thanks to an Iterative Projection algorithm. This allowed us to carry out successful experiments on the HyQ robot, that was able to negotiate obstacles of moderate dimensions while carrying an extra 10 kg payload.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.