Paper detail

fbst: An R package for the Full Bayesian Significance Test for testing a sharp null hypothesis against its alternative via the e-value

Hypothesis testing is a central statistical method in psychology and the cognitive sciences. However, the problems of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) and p-values have been debated widely, but few attractive alternatives exist. This article introduces the fbst R package, which implements the Full Bayesian Significance Test (FBST) to test a sharp null hypothesis against its alternative via the e-value. The statistical theory of the FBST has been introduced by Pereira et al. (1999) more than two decades ago and since then, the FBST has shown to be a Bayesian alternative to NHST and p-values with both theoretical and practical highly appealing properties. The algorithm provided in the fbst package is applicable to any Bayesian model as long as the posterior distribution can be obtained at least numerically. The core function of the package provides the Bayesian evidence against the null hypothesis, the e-value. Additionally, p-values based on asymptotic arguments can be computed and rich visualisations for communication and interpretation of the results can be produced. Three examples of frequently used statistical procedures in the cognitive sciences are given in this paper which demonstrate how to apply the FBST in practice using the fbst package. Based on the success of the FBST in statistical science, the fbst package should be of interest to a broad range of researchers in psychology and the cognitive sciences and hopefully will encourage researchers to consider the FBST as a possible alternative when conducting hypothesis tests of a sharp null hypothesis.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.