Paper detail

Faster Decomposition of Weighted Graphs into Cliques using Fisher's Inequality

Mining groups of genes that consistently co-express is an important problem in biomedical research, where it is critical for applications such as drug-repositioning and designing new disease treatments. Recently, Cooley et al. modeled this problem as Exact Weighted Clique Decomposition (EWCD) in which, given an edge-weighted graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, the goal is to decompose $G$ into at most $k$ (overlapping) weighted cliques so that an edge's weight is exactly equal to the sum of weights for cliques it participates in. They show EWCD is fixed-parameter-tractable, giving a $4^k$-kernel alongside a backtracking algorithm (together called cricca) to iteratively build a decomposition. Unfortunately, because of inherent exponential growth in the space of potential solutions, cricca is typically able to decompose graphs only when $k \leq 11$. In this work, we establish reduction rules that exponentially decrease the size of the kernel (from $4^k$ to $k2^k$) for EWCD. In addition, we use insights about the structure of potential solutions to give new search rules that speed up the decomposition algorithm. At the core of our techniques is a result from combinatorial design theory called Fisher's inequality characterizing set systems with restricted intersections. We deploy our kernelization and decomposition algorithms (together called DeCAF) on a corpus of biologically-inspired data and obtain over two orders of magnitude speed-up over cricca. As a result, DeCAF scales to instances with $k \geq 17$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.