Paper detail

Faster 3-Periodic Merging Networks

We consider the problem of merging two sorted sequences on a comparator network that is used repeatedly, that is, if the output is not sorted, the network is applied again using the output as input. The challenging task is to construct such networks of small depth. The first constructions of merging networks with a constant period were given by Kutyłowski, Loryś and Oesterdikhoff. They have given $3$-periodic network that merges two sorted sequences of $N$ numbers in time $12\log N$ and a similar network of period $4$ that works in $5.67\log N$. We present a new family of such networks that are based on Canfield and Williamson periodic sorter. Our $3$-periodic merging networks work in time upper-bounded by $6\log N$. The construction can be easily generalized to larger constant periods with decreasing running time, for example, to $4$-periodic ones that work in time upper-bounded by $4\log N$. Moreover, to obtain the facts we have introduced a new proof technique.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.