Paper detail

FastAdaBelief: Improving Convergence Rate for Belief-based Adaptive Optimizers by Exploiting Strong Convexity

AdaBelief, one of the current best optimizers, demonstrates superior generalization ability compared to the popular Adam algorithm by viewing the exponential moving average of observed gradients. AdaBelief is theoretically appealing in that it has a data-dependent $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret bound when objective functions are convex, where $T$ is a time horizon. It remains however an open problem whether the convergence rate can be further improved without sacrificing its generalization ability. %on how to exploit strong convexity to further improve the convergence rate of AdaBelief. To this end, we make a first attempt in this work and design a novel optimization algorithm called FastAdaBelief that aims to exploit its strong convexity in order to achieve an even faster convergence rate. In particular, by adjusting the step size that better considers strong convexity and prevents fluctuation, our proposed FastAdaBelief demonstrates excellent generalization ability as well as superior convergence. As an important theoretical contribution, we prove that FastAdaBelief attains a data-dependant $O(\log T)$ regret bound, which is substantially lower than AdaBelief. On the empirical side, we validate our theoretical analysis with extensive experiments in both scenarios of strong and non-strong convexity on three popular baseline models. Experimental results are very encouraging: FastAdaBelief converges the quickest in comparison to all mainstream algorithms while maintaining an excellent generalization ability, in cases of both strong or non-strong convexity. FastAdaBelief is thus posited as a new benchmark model for the research community.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.