Fast & rigorous predictions for A=6A=6 nuclei with Bayesian posterior sampling

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Abstract

We make ab initio predictions for the A = 6 nuclear level scheme based on two- and three-nucleon interactions up to next-to-next-to-leading order in chiral effective field theory (χχEFT). We utilize eigenvector continuation and Bayesian methods to quantify uncertainties stemming from the many-body method, the χχEFT truncation, and the low-energy constants of the nuclear interaction. The construction and validation of emulators is made possible via the development of JupiterNCSM -- a new M-scheme no-core shell model code that uses on-the-fly Hamiltonian matrix construction for efficient, single-node computations up to Nmax=10N_\mathrm{max} = 10 for 6Li{}^{6}\mathrm{Li}. We find a slight underbinding of 6He{}^{6}\mathrm{He} and 6Li{}^{6}\mathrm{Li}, although consistent with experimental data given our theoretical error bars. As a result of incorporating a correlated χχEFT-truncation errors we find more precise predictions (smaller error bars) for separation energies: Sd(6Li)=0.89±0.44S_d({}^{6}\mathrm{Li}) = 0.89 \pm 0.44 MeV, S2n(6He)=0.20±0.60S_{2n}({}^{6}\mathrm{He}) = 0.20 \pm 0.60 MeV, and for the beta decay Q-value: Qβ−(6He)=3.71±0.65Q_{β^-}({}^{6}\mathrm{He}) = 3.71 \pm 0.65 MeV. We conclude that our error bars can potentially be reduced further by extending the model space used by JupiterNCSM.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.