Paper detail

Fast & rigorous predictions for $A=6$ nuclei with Bayesian posterior sampling

We make ab initio predictions for the A = 6 nuclear level scheme based on two- and three-nucleon interactions up to next-to-next-to-leading order in chiral effective field theory ($χ$EFT). We utilize eigenvector continuation and Bayesian methods to quantify uncertainties stemming from the many-body method, the $χ$EFT truncation, and the low-energy constants of the nuclear interaction. The construction and validation of emulators is made possible via the development of JupiterNCSM -- a new M-scheme no-core shell model code that uses on-the-fly Hamiltonian matrix construction for efficient, single-node computations up to $N_\mathrm{max} = 10$ for ${}^{6}\mathrm{Li}$. We find a slight underbinding of ${}^{6}\mathrm{He}$ and ${}^{6}\mathrm{Li}$, although consistent with experimental data given our theoretical error bars. As a result of incorporating a correlated $χ$EFT-truncation errors we find more precise predictions (smaller error bars) for separation energies: $S_d({}^{6}\mathrm{Li}) = 0.89 \pm 0.44$ MeV, $S_{2n}({}^{6}\mathrm{He}) = 0.20 \pm 0.60$ MeV, and for the beta decay Q-value: $Q_{β^-}({}^{6}\mathrm{He}) = 3.71 \pm 0.65$ MeV. We conclude that our error bars can potentially be reduced further by extending the model space used by JupiterNCSM.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.