Paper detail

FAST-PPR: Scaling Personalized PageRank Estimation for Large Graphs

We propose a new algorithm, FAST-PPR, for estimating personalized PageRank: given start node $s$ and target node $t$ in a directed graph, and given a threshold $δ$, FAST-PPR estimates the Personalized PageRank $π_s(t)$ from $s$ to $t$, guaranteeing a small relative error as long $π_s(t)>δ$. Existing algorithms for this problem have a running-time of $Ω(1/δ)$; in comparison, FAST-PPR has a provable average running-time guarantee of ${O}(\sqrt{d/δ})$ (where $d$ is the average in-degree of the graph). This is a significant improvement, since $δ$ is often $O(1/n)$ (where $n$ is the number of nodes) for applications. We also complement the algorithm with an $Ω(1/\sqrtδ)$ lower bound for PageRank estimation, showing that the dependence on $δ$ cannot be improved. We perform a detailed empirical study on numerous massive graphs, showing that FAST-PPR dramatically outperforms existing algorithms. For example, on the 2010 Twitter graph with 1.5 billion edges, for target nodes sampled by popularity, FAST-PPR has a $20$ factor speedup over the state of the art. Furthermore, an enhanced version of FAST-PPR has a $160$ factor speedup on the Twitter graph, and is at least $20$ times faster on all our candidate graphs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.