Paper detail

Fast Kernel Density Estimation with Density Matrices and Random Fourier Features

Kernel density estimation (KDE) is one of the most widely used nonparametric density estimation methods. The fact that it is a memory-based method, i.e., it uses the entire training data set for prediction, makes it unsuitable for most current big data applications. Several strategies, such as tree-based or hashing-based estimators, have been proposed to improve the efficiency of the kernel density estimation method. The novel density kernel density estimation method (DMKDE) uses density matrices, a quantum mechanical formalism, and random Fourier features, an explicit kernel approximation, to produce density estimates. This method has its roots in the KDE and can be considered as an approximation method, without its memory-based restriction. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the novel DMKDE algorithm and compare it with other state-of-the-art fast procedures for approximating the kernel density estimation method on different synthetic data sets. Our experimental results show that DMKDE is on par with its competitors for computing density estimates and advantages are shown when performed on high-dimensional data. We have made all the code available as an open source software repository.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.