Paper detail

Fast Gradient Non-sign Methods

Adversarial attacks make their success in DNNs, and among them, gradient-based algorithms become one of the mainstreams. Based on the linearity hypothesis, under $\ell_\infty$ constraint, $sign$ operation applied to the gradients is a good choice for generating perturbations. However, side-effects from such operation exist since it leads to the bias of direction between real gradients and perturbations. In other words, current methods contain a gap between real gradients and actual noises, which leads to biased and inefficient attacks. Therefore in this paper, based on the Taylor expansion, the bias is analyzed theoretically, and the correction of $sign$, i.e., Fast Gradient Non-sign Method (FGNM), is further proposed. Notably, FGNM is a general routine that seamlessly replaces the conventional $sign$ operation in gradient-based attacks with negligible extra computational cost. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods. Specifically, for untargeted black-box attacks, ours outperform them by 27.5% at most and 9.5% on average. For targeted attacks against defense models, it is 15.1% and 12.7%. Our anonymous code is publicly available at https://github.com/yaya-cheng/FGNM

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.