Paper detail

Fast electrostatic solvers for kinetic Monte Carlo simulations

Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) is an important computational tool in physics and chemistry. In contrast to standard Monte Carlo, KMC permits the description of time dependent dynamical processes and is not restricted to systems in equilibrium. Recently KMC has been applied successfully in modelling of novel energy materials such as Lithium-ion batteries and solar cells. We consider general solid state systems which contain free, interacting particles which can hop between localised sites in the material. The KMC transition rates for those hops depend on the change in total potential energy of the system. For charged particles this requires the frequent calculation of electrostatic interactions, which is usually the bottleneck of the simulation. To avoid this issue and obtain results in reasonable times, many studies replace the long-range potential by a short range approximation. This, however, leads to systematic errors and unphysical results. On the other hand standard electrostatic solvers such as Ewald summation or fast Poisson solvers are highly inefficient or introduce uncontrollable systematic errors at high resolution. In this paper we describe how the Fast Multipole Method by Greengard and Rokhlin can be adapted to overcome this issue by dramatically reducing computational costs. We exploit the fact that each update in the transition rate calculation corresponds to a single particle move and changes the configuration only by a small amount. This allows us to construct an algorithm which scales linearly in the number of charges for each KMC step, something which had not been deemed to be possible before. We demonstrate the performance and parallel scalability of the method by implementing it in a performance portable software library. We describe the high-level Python interface of the code which makes it easy to adapt to specific cases.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.