Paper detail

Fast community detection by SCORE

Consider a network where the nodes split into $K$ different communities. The community labels for the nodes are unknown and it is of major interest to estimate them (i.e., community detection). Degree Corrected Block Model (DCBM) is a popular network model. How to detect communities with the DCBM is an interesting problem, where the main challenge lies in the degree heterogeneity. We propose a new approach to community detection which we call the Spectral Clustering On Ratios-of-Eigenvectors (SCORE). Compared to classical spectral methods, the main innovation is to use the entry-wise ratios between the first leading eigenvector and each of the other leading eigenvectors for clustering. Let $A$ be the adjacency matrix of the network. We first obtain the $K$ leading eigenvectors of $A$, say, $\hatη_1,\ldots,\hatη_K$, and let $\hat{R}$ be the $n\times (K-1)$ matrix such that $\hat{R}(i,k)=\hatη_{k+1}(i)/\hatη_1(i)$, $1\leq i\leq n$, $1\leq k\leq K-1$. We then use $\hat{R}$ for clustering by applying the $k$-means method. The central surprise is, the effect of degree heterogeneity is largely ancillary, and can be effectively removed by taking entry-wise ratios between $\hatη_{k+1}$ and $\hatη_1$, $1\leq k\leq K-1$. The method is successfully applied to the web blogs data and the karate club data, with error rates of $58/1222$ and $1/34$, respectively. These results are more satisfactory than those by the classical spectral methods. Additionally, compared to modularity methods, SCORE is easier to implement, computationally faster, and also has smaller error rates. We develop a theoretic framework where we show that under mild conditions, the SCORE stably yields consistent community detection. In the core of the analysis is the recent development on Random Matrix Theory (RMT), where the matrix-form Bernstein inequality is especially helpful.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.