Paper detail

Fast and Accurate Importance Weighting for Correcting Sample Bias

Bias in datasets can be very detrimental for appropriate statistical estimation. In response to this problem, importance weighting methods have been developed to match any biased distribution to its corresponding target unbiased distribution. The seminal Kernel Mean Matching (KMM) method is, nowadays, still considered as state of the art in this research field. However, one of the main drawbacks of this method is the computational burden for large datasets. Building on previous works by Huang et al. (2007) and de Mathelin et al. (2021), we derive a novel importance weighting algorithm which scales to large datasets by using a neural network to predict the instance weights. We show, on multiple public datasets, under various sample biases, that our proposed approach drastically reduces the computational time on large dataset while maintaining similar sample bias correction performance compared to other importance weighting methods. The proposed approach appears to be the only one able to give relevant reweighting in a reasonable time for large dataset with up to two million data.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.