Paper detail

Failure of steady state thermodynamics in lattice gases under nonuniform drive

To be useful, steady state thermodynamics (SST) must be self-consistent and have predictive value. Although consistency of SST was recently verified for driven lattice gases under global weak exchange, I show here that it does not predict the coexisting densities in athermal stochastic lattice gases under a nonuniform drive. I consider the lattice gas with nearest-neighbor exclusion on the square lattice, with nearest-neighbor hopping (NNE dynamics), and with hopping to both nearest and next-nearest neighbors (NNE2 dynamics). Part of the system is subject to a drive $D$ that favors hopping along one direction, while the other part is free of the drive. Thus the steady state represents coexistence between two subsystems, one far from equilibrium and the other in equilibrium, which exchange particles along the interfaces. The dimensionless chemical potential $μ^*(ρ,D) = μ/k_B T$ for the lattice gas with density $ρ$ is readily determined in studies of a uniform system. Under the nonuniform drive, however, equating the chemical potentials of the coexisting subsystems does not yield the coexisting densities. The steady state chemical potential is, moreover, different in the coexisting bulk regions, contrary to the basic principles of thermodynamics. These results cast serious doubt on the predictive value of SST.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.