Paper detail

Factorization and dispersion relations for radiative leptonic $B$ decay

Applying the dispersion approach we compute perturbative QCD corrections to the power suppressed soft contribution of $B \to γ\ell ν$ at leading twist. QCD factorization for the $B \to γ^{\ast}$ form factors is demonstrated explicitly for the hard-collinear transverse polarized photon at one loop, with the aid of the method of regions. While the one-loop hard function is identical to the matching coefficient of the QCD weak current $\bar u \, γ_{μ\perp} \, (1- γ_5) \, b$ in soft-collinear effective theory, the jet function from integrating out the hard-collinear fluctuations differs from the corresponding one entering the factorization formula of $B \to γ\ell ν$. Furthermore, we evaluate the sub-leading power contribution to the $B \to γ$ form factors from the three-particle $B$-meson distribution amplitudes (DAs) at tree level. The soft contribution to the $B \to γ$ form factors from the three-particle $B$-meson DAs is shown to be of the same power compared with the corresponding hard correction, in contrast to the two-particle counterparts. Numerically the next-to-leading-order QCD correction to the soft two-particle contribution in $B \to γ$ form factors will induce an approximately $\left (10 \sim 20 \right) \%$ shift to the tree-level contribution at $λ_B(μ_0)=354 \, {\rm MeV}$. Albeit of power suppression parametrically, the soft two-particle correction can decrease the leading power predictions for the $B \to γ$ form factors by an amount of $\left (10 \sim 30 \right) \%$ with the same value of $λ_B(μ_0)$. Employing the phenomenological model of the three-particle $B$-meson DAs inspired by a QCD sum rule analysis, the three-particle contribution to the $B \to γ$ form factors is predicted to be of ${\cal O} (1 \%)$, at leading order in $α_s$, with the default theory inputs.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.