Paper detail

Extraction of $a_1$ and $a_2$ from $B\to ψK(K^*),~ D(D^*)π(ρ)$ Decays

Based on the factorization approach, we show that the CLEO data for the ratio $Γ(B\toψK^*)/Γ(B\to ψK)$ and the CDF measurement of the fraction of longitudinal polarization in $B\toψK^*$ can be accounted for by the heavy-flavor-symmetry approach for heavy-light form factors provided that the form factor $F_0$ behaves as a constant, while the $q^2$ dependence is of the monopole form for $F_1,~ A_0,~A_1$, and of the dipole behavior for $A_2$ and $V$. This $q^2$ extrapolation for form factors is further supported by $B\to K^*γ$ data and by a recent QCD-sum-rule analysis. We then apply this method to $B\to D(D^*)π(ρ)$ decays to extract the parameters $a_1$ and $a_2$. It is found that $a_1(B\to D^{(*)}π(ρ))=1.01\pm 0.06$ and $a_2(B\to D^{(*)}π(ρ))=0.23\pm 0.06\,$. Our result $a_2/a_1=0.22\pm 0.06$ thus significantly improves the previous analysis that leads to $a_2/a_1=0.23\pm 0.11$. We argue that, contrary to what anticipated from the leading $1/N_c$ expansion, the sign of $a_2(B\toψ\K)$ should be positive and $a_2(B\toψ\K)~{\large ^>_\sim}~ a_2(B\to D^{(*)}π(ρ))$.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.