Paper detail

Extracting more from boosted decision trees: A high energy physics case study

Particle identification is one of the core tasks in the data analysis pipeline at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Statistically, this entails the identification of rare signal events buried in immense backgrounds that mimic the properties of the former. In machine learning parlance, particle identification represents a classification problem characterized by overlapping and imbalanced classes. Boosted decision trees (BDTs) have had tremendous success in the particle identification domain but more recently have been overshadowed by deep learning (DNNs) approaches. This work proposes an algorithm to extract more out of standard boosted decision trees by targeting their main weakness, susceptibility to overfitting. This novel construction harnesses the meta-learning techniques of boosting and bagging simultaneously and performs remarkably well on the ATLAS Higgs (H) to tau-tau data set (ATLAS et al., 2014) which was the subject of the 2014 Higgs ML Challenge (Adam-Bourdarios et al., 2015). While the decay of Higgs to a pair of tau leptons was established in 2018 (CMS collaboration et al., 2017) at the 4.9$σ$ significance based on the 2016 data taking period, the 2014 public data set continues to serve as a benchmark data set to test the performance of supervised classification schemes. We show that the score achieved by the proposed algorithm is very close to the published winning score which leverages an ensemble of deep neural networks (DNNs). Although this paper focuses on a single application, it is expected that this simple and robust technique will find wider applications in high energy physics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.