Paper detail

Extension of the ratio method to proton-rich nuclei

The ratio method has been developed to improve the study of one-neutron halo nuclei through reactions. By taking the ratio of angular distributions for two processes, viz. breakup and elastic scattering, this new observable is nearly independent of the reaction mechanism and hence much more sensitive to the projectile structure than the cross sections for each single process. We study the extension of the ratio method to proton-rich nuclei and also explore the optimum experimental conditions for measuring this new observable. We compare accurate dynamical calculations of reactions for proton-rich projectiles to the prediction of the ratio method. We use the dynamical eikonal approximation that provides good results for this kind of reactions at intermediate energy. Our tests for 8B, an archteypical one-proton halo nucleus, on Pb, Ni, and C targets at 44 MeV/nucleon show that, the ratio works less well than for neutron halos due to the non-negligible Coulomb interaction between the valence proton and the target. Nevertheless, the ratio method still provides pertinent information about nuclear structure on the proton-rich side of the valley of stability. Interestingly the method is not affected if energy ranges-or bins-are considered in the projectile continuum. This makes the ratio easier to measure experimentally by increasing the breakup cross section. We also extend our analysis to 17F, 25Al, and 27P, whose study is of interest to both nuclear astrophysics and nuclear structure. We show that, albeit less precise than for one-neutron halo nuclei, nuclear-structure information can be inferred from the ratio method applied to exotic proton-rich nuclei. In particular, when the valence proton is loosely bound in an $s$ or $p$ orbital, viz. for proton halo nuclei, detailed structure information can be obtained through this new reaction observable.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.