Paper detail

Extending the OpenCHK Model with Advanced Checkpoint Features

One of the major challenges in using extreme scale systems efficiently is to mitigate the impact of faults. Application-level checkpoint/restart (CR) methods provide the best trade-off between productivity, robustness, and performance. There are many solutions implementing CR at the application level. They all provide advanced I/O capabilities to minimize the overhead introduced by CR. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement in terms of programmability and flexibility, because end-users must manually serialize and deserialize application state using low-level APIs, modify the flow of the application to consider restarts, or rewrite CR code whenever the backend library changes. In this work, we propose a set of compiler directives and clauses that allow users to specify CR operations in a simple way. Our approach supports the common CR features provided by all the CR libraries. However, it can also be extended to support advanced features that are only available in some CR libraries, such as differential checkpointing, the use of HDF5 format, and the possibility of using fault-tolerance-dedicated threads. The result of our evaluation revealed a high increase in programmability. On average, we reduced the number of lines of code by 71%, 94%, and 64% for FTI, SCR, and VeloC, respectively, and no additional overhead was perceived using our solution compared to using the backend libraries directly. Finally, portability is enhanced because our programming model allows the use of any backend library without changing any code.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.