Paper detail

Extended Parameterisations for MSTW PDFs and their effect on Lepton Charge Asymmetry from W Decays

We investigate the effect of extending the standard MSTW parameterisation of input parton distribution functions (PDFs) using Chebyshev polynomials. We find evidence that four powers in the polynomial are sufficient for extremely high precision. Applying this to valence and sea quarks we find an improvement in the global fit, but a significant change only in the small-$x$ valence up-quark PDF, $u_V$. We investigate the effect of also extending, and making more flexible, the `nuclear' correction to deuteron structure functions. The extended `Chebyshev' parameterisation results in an improved stability in the deuteron corrections that are required for the best fit to the `global' data. The resulting PDFs have a significantly, but not dramatically, altered valence down-quark distribution, $d_V$. For the extended set of MSTW PDFs, their uncertainties can be obtained using 23, rather than the usual 20, orthogonal `uncertainty' eigenvectors. Since the dominant effect is on the valence quarks, we present a detailed study of the dependence of the valence--sea separation on the predictions for the decay lepton charge asymmetry which results from $W^\pm$ production at the LHC, illustrating the PDFs and the $x$ range probed for different experimental scenarios. We show that the modified MSTW PDFs make significantly improved predictions for these data at the LHC, particularly for high values of the $p_T$ cut of the decay lepton. However, this is a special case, since the asymmetry is extremely sensitive to valence--sea details, and in particular to the combination $u_V-d_V$ of valence PDFs for $x \sim M_W/\sqrt{s}$ at low lepton rapidities. We show that the predictions for a wide variety of total cross sections are very similar to those obtained using the MSTW2008 PDFs, with changes being much smaller than the PDF uncertainties.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.