Paper detail

Extended canonical Monte Carlo methods: Improving accuracy of microcanonical calculations using a re-weighting technique

Velazquez and Curilef have proposed a methodology to extend Monte Carlo algorithms that are based on canonical ensemble. According to our previous study, their proposal allows us to overcome slow sampling problems in systems that undergo any type of temperature-driven phase transition. After a comprehensive review about ideas and connections of this framework, we discuss the application a re-weighting technique to improve the accuracy of microcanonical calculations, specifically, the well-known multi-histograms method of Ferrenberg and Swendsen. As example of application, we reconsider the study of four-state Potts model on the square lattice $L\times L$ with periodic boundary conditions. This analysis allows us to detect the existence of a very small latent heat per site $q_{L}$ during the occurrence of temperature-driven phase transition of this model, whose size dependence seems to follow a power-law $q_{L}(L)\propto(1/L)^{z}$ with exponent $z\simeq0$.$26\pm0$.$02$. It is discussed the compatibility of these results with the continuous character of temperature-driven phase transition when $L\rightarrow+\infty$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.