Paper detail

Exponentially Weighted l_2 Regularization Strategy in Constructing Reinforced Second-order Fuzzy Rule-based Model

In the conventional Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK)-type fuzzy models, constant or linear functions are usually utilized as the consequent parts of the fuzzy rules, but they cannot effectively describe the behavior within local regions defined by the antecedent parts. In this article, a theoretical and practical design methodology is developed to address this problem. First, the information granulation (Fuzzy C-Means) method is applied to capture the structure in the data and split the input space into subspaces, as well as form the antecedent parts. Second, the quadratic polynomials (QPs) are employed as the consequent parts. Compared with constant and linear functions, QPs can describe the input-output behavior within the local regions (subspaces) by refining the relationship between input and output variables. However, although QP can improve the approximation ability of the model, it could lead to the deterioration of the prediction ability of the model (e.g., overfitting). To handle this issue, we introduce an exponential weight approach inspired by the weight function theory encountered in harmonic analysis. More specifically, we adopt the exponential functions as the targeted penalty terms, which are equipped with l2 regularization (l2) (i.e., exponential weighted l2, ewl_2) to match the proposed reinforced second-order fuzzy rule-based model (RSFRM) properly. The advantage of el 2 compared to ordinary l2 lies in separately identifying and penalizing different types of polynomial terms in the coefficient estimation, and its results not only alleviate the overfitting and prevent the deterioration of generalization ability but also effectively release the prediction potential of the model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.