Paper detail

Explosive site percolation and finite size hysteresis

We report the critical point for site percolation for the "explosive" type for 2D square lattices using Monte Carlo simulations and compare it to the classical well known percolation. We use similar algorithms as have been recently reported for bond percolation and networks. We calculate the "explosive" site percolation threshold as $p_c=0.695$ and we find evidence that "explosive" site percolation surprisingly may belong to a different universality class than bond percolation on lattices, providing that the transitions (a) are continuous and (b) obey the conventional finite size scaling forms. We do not attempt to determine the order of the explosive transition. Finally, we study and compare the direct and reverse processes, showing that while the reverse process is different from the direct process for finite size systems, the two cases become equivalent in the thermodynamic limit of large $L$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.