Paper detail

Explosive, continuous and frustrated synchronization transition in spiking Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal networks: the role of topology and synaptic interaction

Synchronization is an important collective phenomenon in interacting oscillatory agents. Many functional features of the brain are related to synchronization of neurons. The type of synchronization transition that may occur (explosive vs. continuous) has been the focus of intense attention in recent years, mostly in the context of phase oscillator models for which collective behavior is independent of the mean-value of natural frequency. However, synchronization properties of biologically-motivated neural models depend on the firing frequencies. In this study we report a systematic study of gamma-band synchronization in spiking Hodgkin-Huxley neurons which interact via electrical or chemical synapses. We use various network models in order to define the connectivity matrix. We find that the underlying mechanisms and types of synchronization transitions in gamma-band differs from beta-band. In gamma-band, network regularity suppresses transition while randomness promotes a continuous transition. Heterogeneity in the underlying topology does not lead to any change in the order of transition, however, correlation between number of synapses and frequency of a neuron will lead to explosive synchronization in heterogenous networks with electrical synapses. Furthermore, small-world networks modeling a fine balance between clustering and randomness (as in the cortex), lead to explosive synchronization with electrical synapses, but a smooth transition in the case of chemical synapses. We also find that hierarchical modular networks, such as the connectome, lead to frustrated transitions. We explain our results based on various properties of the network, paying particular attention to the competition between clustering and long-range synapses.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.