Paper detail

Exploring the parameter reusability of CNN

In recent times, using small data to train networks has become a hot topic in the field of deep learning. Reusing pre-trained parameters is one of the most important strategies to address the issue of semi-supervised and transfer learning. However, the fundamental reason for the success of these methods is still unclear. In this paper, we propose a solution that can not only judge whether a given network is reusable or not based on the performance of reusing convolution kernels but also judge which layers' parameters of the given network can be reused, based on the performance of reusing corresponding parameters and, ultimately, judge whether those parameters are reusable or not in a target task based on the root mean square error (RMSE) of the corresponding convolution kernels. Specifically, we define that the success of a CNN's parameter reuse depends upon two conditions: first, the network is a reusable network; and second, the RMSE between the convolution kernels from the source domain and target domain is small enough. The experimental results demonstrate that the performance of reused parameters applied to target tasks, when these conditions are met, is significantly improved.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.