Paper detail

Exploring crossmodal perceptual enhancement and integration in a sequence-reproducing task with cognitive priming

Leveraging the perceptual phenomenon of crossmoal correspondence has been shown to facilitate peoples information processing and improves sensorimotor performance. However for goal-oriented interactive tasks, the question of how to enhance the perception of specific Crossmodal information, and how Crossmodal information integration takes place during interaction is still unclear. The present paper reports two experiments investigating these questions. In the first experiment, a cognitive priming technique was introduced as a way to enhance the perception of two Crossmodal stimuli, in two conditions respectively, and their effect on sensory-motor performance was observed. Based on the results, the second experiment combined the two Crossmodal stimuli in the same interfaces in a way that their correspondence congruency was mutually exclusive. The same priming techniques was applied as a manipulating factor to observe the Crossmodal integration process. Results showed that first, the Crossmodal integration during interaction can be enhanced by the priming technique, but the effect varies according to the combination of Crossmodal stimuli and the types of priming material. Moreover, peoples subjective evaluations towards priming types were in contradiction with their objective behavioural data. Second, when two Crossmodal sequences can be perceived simultaneously, results suggested different perceptual weights are possessed by different participants, and the perceptual enhancement effect was observed only on the dominant one, the pitch-elevation. Furthermore, the Crossmodal integration tended to be integrated in a selective manner without priming. These results contribute design implications for multisensory feedback and mindless computing.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.