Paper detail

Exploiting Weight Redundancy in CNNs: Beyond Pruning and Quantization

Pruning and quantization are proven methods for improving the performance and storage efficiency of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Pruning removes near-zero weights in tensors and masks weak connections between neurons in neighbouring layers. Quantization reduces the precision of weights by replacing them with numerically similar values that require less storage. In this paper, we identify another form of redundancy in CNN weight tensors, in the form of repeated patterns of similar values. We observe that pruning and quantization both tend to drastically increase the number of repeated patterns in the weight tensors. We investigate several compression schemes to take advantage of this structure in CNN weight data, including multiple forms of Huffman coding, and other approaches inspired by block sparse matrix formats. We evaluate our approach on several well-known CNNs and find that we can achieve compaction ratios of 1.4x to 3.1x in addition to the saving from pruning and quantization.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.