Paper detail

Explicit power laws in analytic continuation problems via reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces

The need for analytic continuation arises frequently in the context of inverse problems. Notwithstanding the uniqueness theorems, such problems are notoriously ill-posed without additional regularizing constraints. We consider several analytic continuation problems with typical global boundedness constraints that restore well-posedness. We show that all such problems exhibit a power law precision deterioration as one moves away from the source of data. In this paper we demonstrate the effectiveness of our general Hilbert space-based approach for determining these exponents. The method identifies the "worst case" function as a solution of a linear integral equation of Fredholm type. In special geometries, such as the circular annulus or upper half-plane this equation can be solved explicitly. The obtained solution in the annulus is then used to determine the exact power law exponent for the analytic continuation from an interval between the foci of an ellipse to an arbitrary point inside the ellipse. Our formulas are consistent with results obtained in prior work in those special cases when such exponents have been determined.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.