BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Narek Hovsepyan

Narek Hovsepyan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.APmath.AGmath.CVmath.DG

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

On the lack of external response of a nonlinear medium in the second-harmonic generation process

This paper concerns the scattering problem for a nonlinear medium of compact support, $D$, with second-harmonic generation. Such a medium, when probed with monochromatic light beams at frequency $ω$, generates additional waves at frequency $2ω$. The response of the medium is governed by a system of two coupled semilinear partial differential equations for the electric fields at frequency $ω$ and $2ω$. We investigate whether there are situations in which the generated $2ω$ wave is localized inside $D$, that is, the nonlinear interaction of the medium with the probing wave is invisible to an outside observer. This leads to the analysis of a semilinear elliptic system formulated in $D$ with non-standard boundary conditions. The analysis presented here sets up a mathematical framework needed to investigate a multitude of questions related to nonlinear scattering with second-harmonic generation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On the extreme rays of the cone of $3\times 3$ quasiconvex quadratic forms: Extremal determinats vs extremal and polyconvex forms

This work is concerned with the study of the extreme rays of the convex cone of $3\times 3$ quasiconvex quadratic forms (denoted by ${\cal C}_3$). We characterize quadratic forms $f\in {\cal C}_3,$ the determinant of the acoustic tensor of which is an extremal polynomial, and conjecture/discuss about other cases. We prove that in the case when the determinant of the acoustic tensor of a form $f\in {\cal C}_3$ is an extremal polynomial other than a perfect square, then the form must itself be an extreme ray of ${\cal C}_3;$ when the determinant is a perfect square, then the form is either an extreme ray of ${\cal C}_3$ or polyconvex; and finally, when the determinant is identically zero, then the form $f$ must be polyconvex. The zero determinant case plays an important role in the proofs of the other two cases. We also make a conjecture on the extreme rays of ${\cal C}_3,$ and discuss about weak and strong etremals of ${\cal C}_d$ for $d\geq 3.$ where it turns out that several properties of ${\cal C}_3$ do not hold for ${\cal C}_d$ for $d>3,$ and thus case $d=3$ is special. These results recover all previously known results (to our best knowledge) on examples of extreme points of ${\cal C}_3$ that were proved to be such. Our results also improve the ones proven by the first author and Milton [20].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Explicit power laws in analytic continuation problems via reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces

The need for analytic continuation arises frequently in the context of inverse problems. Notwithstanding the uniqueness theorems, such problems are notoriously ill-posed without additional regularizing constraints. We consider several analytic continuation problems with typical global boundedness constraints that restore well-posedness. We show that all such problems exhibit a power law precision deterioration as one moves away from the source of data. In this paper we demonstrate the effectiveness of our general Hilbert space-based approach for determining these exponents. The method identifies the "worst case" function as a solution of a linear integral equation of Fredholm type. In special geometries, such as the circular annulus or upper half-plane this equation can be solved explicitly. The obtained solution in the annulus is then used to determine the exact power law exponent for the analytic continuation from an interval between the foci of an ellipse to an arbitrary point inside the ellipse. Our formulas are consistent with results obtained in prior work in those special cases when such exponents have been determined.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Rigidity of a thin domain depends on the curvature, width, and boundary conditions

This paper is concerned with the study of linear geometric rigidity of shallow thin domains under zero Dirichlet boundary conditions on the displacement field on the thin edge of the domain. A shallow thin domain is a thin domain that has in-plane dimensions of order $O(1)$ and $ε,$ where $ε\in (h,1)$ is a parameter (here $h$ is the thickness of the shell). The problem has been solved in [8,10] for the case $ε=1,$ with the outcome of the optimal constant $C\sim h^{-3/2},$ $C\sim h^{-4/3},$ and $C\sim h^{-1}$ for parabolic, hyperbolic and elliptic thin domains respectively. We prove in the present work that in fact there are two distinctive scaling regimes $ε\in (h,\sqrt h]$ and $ε\in (\sqrt h,1),$ such that in each of which the thin domain rigidity is given by a certain formula in $h$ and $ε.$ An interesting new phenomenon is that in the first (small parameter) regime $ε\in (h,\sqrt h]$, the rigidity does not depend on the curvature of the thin domain mid-surface.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access