Paper detail

Explicit Analytical Solution for Random Close Packing in d=2 and d=3

We present an analytical derivation of the volume fractions for random close packing (RCP) in both $d=3$ and $d=2$, based on the same methodology. Using suitably modified nearest neigbhour statistics for hard spheres, we obtain $ϕ_{\mathrm{RCP}}=0.65896$ in $d=3$ and $ϕ_{\mathrm{RCP}}=0.88648$ in $d=2$. These values are well within the interval of values reported in the literature using different methods (experiments and numerical simulations) and protocols. This order-agnostic derivation suggests some considerations related to the nature of RCP: (i) RCP corresponds to the onset of mechanical rigidity where the finite shear modulus emerges, (ii) the onset of mechanical rigidity marks the maximally random jammmed state and dictates $ϕ_{\mathrm{RCP}}$ via the coordination number $z$, (iii) disordered packings with $ϕ>ϕ_{\mathrm{RCP}}$ are possible at the expense of creating some order, and $z=12$ at the FCC limit acts as a boundary condition.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.