Paper detail

Explaining the Observed Relation Between Stellar Activity and Rotation

Observations of late-type main-sequence stars have revealed empirical scalings of coronal activity versus rotation period or Rossby number $Ro$ (a ratio of rotation period to convective turnover time) which has hitherto lacked explanation. For $Ro >> 1$, the activity observed as X-ray to bolometric flux varies as $Ro^{-q}$ with $2\le q \le 3$, whilst $|q| < 0.12$ for $Ro << 1$. Here we explain the transition between these two regimes and the power law in the $Ro >> 1$ regime by constructing an expression for the coronal luminosity based on dynamo magnetic field generation and magnetic buoyancy. We explain the $Ro<<1$ behavior from the inference that observed rotation is correlated with internal differential rotation and argue that once the shear time scale is shorter than the convective turnover time, eddies will be shredded on the shear time scale and so the eddy correlation time actually becomes the shear time and the convection time drops out of the equations. We explain the $Ro >> 1$ behavior using a dynamo saturation theory based on magnetic helicity buildup and buoyant loss.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.