Researcher profile

John H. Thomas

John H. Thomas contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Peristaltic pumping in thin, non-axisymmetric, annular tubes

Two-dimensional laminar flow of a viscous fluid induced by peristalsis due to a moving wall wave has been studied previously for a rectangular channel, a circular tube, and a concentric circular annulus. Here we study peristaltic flow in a non-axisymmetric annular tube, where the flow is three dimensional, with azimuthal motions. This geometry is motivated by experimental observations of cerebrospinal fluid flow along perivascular spaces (PVSs) surrounding arteries in the brain, which is at least partially driven by peristaltic pumping. These PVSs are well matched, in cross-section, by an adjustable model consisting of an inner circle (arterial wall) and an outer ellipse (outer edge of the PVS), not necessarily concentric. We use this model, which may have other applications, as a basis for numerical simulations of peristaltic flow. We use a finite-element scheme to compute the flow driven by a propagating sinusoidal radial displacement of the inner wall. Unlike peristaltic flow in a concentric circular annulus, the flow is fully three-dimensional, with streamlines wiggling in both the radial and axial directions. We examine the dependence of the flow on the elongation of the outer elliptical wall and on the eccentricity of the configuration. We find that time-averaged volumetric flow decreases with increasing ellipticity or eccentricity. Azimuthal pressure variations, caused by the wall wave, drive an oscillatory azimuthal flow in and out of the narrower gaps. The additional shearing motion in the azimuthal direction will enhance Taylor dispersion in these flows, an effect that might have practical applications.

preprint2014arXiv

Explaining the Observed Relation Between Stellar Activity and Rotation

Observations of late-type main-sequence stars have revealed empirical scalings of coronal activity versus rotation period or Rossby number $Ro$ (a ratio of rotation period to convective turnover time) which has hitherto lacked explanation. For $Ro >> 1$, the activity observed as X-ray to bolometric flux varies as $Ro^{-q}$ with $2\le q \le 3$, whilst $|q| < 0.12$ for $Ro << 1$. Here we explain the transition between these two regimes and the power law in the $Ro >> 1$ regime by constructing an expression for the coronal luminosity based on dynamo magnetic field generation and magnetic buoyancy. We explain the $Ro<<1$ behavior from the inference that observed rotation is correlated with internal differential rotation and argue that once the shear time scale is shorter than the convective turnover time, eddies will be shredded on the shear time scale and so the eddy correlation time actually becomes the shear time and the convection time drops out of the equations. We explain the $Ro >> 1$ behavior using a dynamo saturation theory based on magnetic helicity buildup and buoyant loss.

preprint2009arXiv

Theoretical Models of Sunspot Structure and Dynamics

Recent progress in theoretical modeling of a sunspot is reviewed. The observed properties of umbral dots are well reproduced by realistic simulations of magnetoconvection in a vertical, monolithic magnetic field. To understand the penumbra, it is useful to distinguish between the inner penumbra, dominated by bright filaments containing slender dark cores, and the outer penumbra, made up of dark and bright filaments of comparable width with corresponding magnetic fields differing in inclination by some 30 degrees and strong Evershed flows in the dark filaments along nearly horizontal or downward-plunging magnetic fields. The role of magnetic flux pumping in submerging magnetic flux in the outer penumbra is examined through numerical experiments, and different geometric models of the penumbral magnetic field are discussed in the light of high-resolution observations. Recent, realistic numerical MHD simulations of an entire sunspot have succeeded in reproducing the salient features of the convective pattern in the umbra and the inner penumbra. The siphon-flow mechanism still provides the best explanation of the Evershed flow, particularly in the outer penumbra where it often consists of cool, supersonic downflows.

preprint2005arXiv

Extracting Rotational Energy in Supernova Progenitors: Transient Poynting Flux Growth vs. Turbulent Dissipation

Observational evidence for anisotropy in supernovae (SN) may signal the importance of angular momentum and differential rotation in the progenitors. Free energy in differential rotation and rotation can be extracted magnetically or via turbulent dissipation. The importance that magnetohydrodyamic jets and coronae may play in driving SN motivates understanding large scale dynamos in SN progenitors. We develop a dynamical large scale interface dynamo model in which the differential rotation and rotation deplete both through Poynting flux and turbulent diffusion. We apply the model to a differentially rotating core surrounded by a convection zone of a SN progenitor from a initial 15$M_\odot$ star. Unlike the Sun, the dynamo is transient because the differential rotation is primarily due to the initial collapse. Up to $\sim 10^{51}$erg can be drained into time-integrated Poynting flux and heat, the relative fraction of which depends on the relative amount of turbulence in the shear layer vs. convection zone and the fraction of the shear layer into which the magnetic field penetrates. Both sinks can help facilitate explosions and could lead to different levels of anisotropy and pulsar kicks. In all cases, the poloidal magnetic field is much weaker than the toroidal field, and the Poynting flux is lower than previous estimates which invoke the magnitude of the total magnetic energy. A signature of a large scale dynamo is that the oscillation of the associated Poynting flux on $\sim 1$ sec time scales, implying the same for the energy delivery to a SN.

preprint2001arXiv

Dynamos in Asymptotic-Giant-Branch Stars As the Origin of Magnetic Fields Shaping Planetary Nebulale

Planetary nebulae are thought to be formed when a slow wind from the progenitor giant star is overtaken by a subsequent fast wind generated as the star enters its white dwarf stage$^{1}$. A shock forms near the boundary between the winds, which creates a relatively dense shell that provides the characteristic appearance of a planetary nebula. A spherically symmetric wind will produce a spherically symmetric shell, yet over half of known planetary nebulae are not spherical; rather, they are elliptical or bipolar in shape$^{2}$. While a magnetic field could launch and collimate a bipolar outflow, the origin of such a field has hitherto been unclear, as previous work suggested that a field could not be generated${^3}$. Here we show that an asymptotic-giant-branch (AGB) star can indeed generate a strong magnetic field, in a dynamo at the interface between a rapidly rotating core and the more slowly rotating envelope of the star. The field is strong enough to shape the bipolar outflows that produce the observed bipolar planetary nebulae. Magnetic braking of the stellar core during this process may also explain the puzzlingly$^{4}$ slow rotation of most white dwarf stars.