Paper detail

Existence and uniqueness of minimizers of general least gradient problems

Motivated by problems arising in conductivity imaging, we prove existence, uniqueness, and comparison theorems - under certain sharp conditions - for minimizers of the general least gradient problem \[\inf_{u\in BV_f(Ω)} \int_Ωφ(x,Du),\] where $f:\partial Ω\to \R$ is continuous, \[ BV_f(Ω):=\{v\in BV(Ω): \ \ \forall x\in \partial Ω, \ \ \lim_{r\to 0} \ \esssup_{y\in Ω, |x-y|<r} |f(x) - v(y)| = 0 \ \} %BV_f(Ω)=\{u\in BV(Ω): {0.1cm} u|_{\partial Ω}=f {0.1cm} \hbox{and} {0.1cm} {0.1cm} u {0.1cm} \hbox{is continuous at} {0.1cm} \partial Ω\}. \] and $φ(x,ξ)$ is a function that, among other properties, is convex and homogeneous of degree 1 with respect to the $ξ$ variable. In particular we prove that if $a\in C^{1,1}(Ω)$ is bounded away from zero, then minimizers of the weighted least gradient problem $\inf_{u \in BV_f}\int_Ω a|Du|$ are unique in $BV_f(Ω)$. We construct counterexamples to show that the regularity assumption $a\in C^{1,1}$ is sharp, in the sense that it can not be replaced by $a\in C^{1,α}(Ω)$ with any $α<1$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.