Paper detail

Exact Performance Analysis of Partial Relay Selection Based on Shadowing Side Information over Generalized Composite Fading Channels

Relay technology has recently gained great interest in millimeter wave (60 GHz or above) radio frequencies as a promising transmission technique improving the quality of service, providing high data rate, and extending the coverage area without additional transmit power in deeply shadowed fading environments. The performance of relay-based systems considerably depends on which relay selection protocols (RSPs) are used. These RSPs are typically using the channel side information (CSI). Specifically, the relay terminal (RT) is chosen among all available RTs by a central entity (CE) which receives all RTs' CSI via feedback channels. However, in the millimeter wave radio frequencies, the rate of the CSI variation is much higher than that of the CSI variation in 6 GHz frequencies under the same mobility conditions, which evidently results in a serious problem causing that the CSI at the CE is inaccurate for the RSP since the feedback channels have a backhaul / transmission delay. However and fortunately, the shadowing side information (SSI) varies very slowly in comparison to the rate of the CSI variation. In this context, we propose in this paper a partial-RSP in dual-hop amplify-and-forward relaying system, which utilize only the SSI of the RTs instead of their CSI. Then for the performance analysis, we obtain an exact average unified performance (AUP) of the proposed SSI-based partial-RSP for a variety shadowed fading environments. In particular, we offer a generic AUP expression whose special cases include the average bit error probability (ABEP) analysis for binary modulation schemes, the ergodic capacity analysis and the moments-generating function (MGF)-based characterization. The correctness of our newly theoretical results is validated with some selected numerical examples in an extended generalized-K fading environment.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.