Paper detail

Exact ground-state properties of one-dimensional electron gas at high density

The dynamical response theory is used to obtain an analytical expression for the exchange energy of a quantum wire for arbitrary polarization and width. It reproduces the known form of exchange energy for 1D electron gas in the limit of infinitely thin cylindrical and harmonic wires. The structure factor for these wires are also obtained analytically in the high-density or small $r_s$ limit. This structure factor enables us to get the {\it exact} correlation energy for both the wires and demonstrates that there are at least two methods to get the ideal Coulomb limit in one dimension. The structure factor and the correlation energy are found to be independent of the way the one-dimensional Coulomb potential is regularized. The analytical expression for the pair correlation function is also presented for small distances and provides a justification for the small $r_s$ expansion as long as $r_s< \frac{3}{2} \left(\frac{π^2}{π^2+3} \right)=1.15$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.