Paper detail

Ex ante prediction of cascade sizes on networks of agents facing binary outcomes

We consider in this paper the potential for ex ante prediction of the cascade size in a model of binary choice with externalities (Schelling 1973, Watts 2002). Agents are connected on a network and can be in one of two states of the world, 0 or 1. Initially, all are in state 0 and a small number of seeds are selected at random to switch to state1. A simple threshold rule specifies whether other agents switch subsequently. The cascade size (the percolation) is the proportion of all agents which eventually switches to state 1. We select information on the connectivity of the initial seeds, the connectivity of the agents to which they are connected, the thresholds of these latter agents, and the thresholds of the agents to which these are connected. We obtain results for random, small world and scale -free networks with different network parameters and numbers of initial seeds. The results are robust with respect to these factors. We perform least squares regression of the logit transformation of the cascade size (Hosmer and Lemeshow 1989) on these potential explanatory variables. We find considerable explanatory power for the ex ante prediction of cascade sizes. For the random networks, on average 32 per cent of the variance of the cascade sizes is explained, 40 per cent for the small world and 46 per cent for the scale-free. The connectivity variables are hardly ever significant in the regressions, whether relating to the seeds themselves or to the agents connected to the seeds. In contrast, the information on the thresholds of agents contains much more explanatory power. This supports the conjecture of Watts and Dodds (2007.) that large cascades are driven by a small mass of easily influenced agents.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.