Paper detail

Every planar graph is $1$-defective $(9,2)$-paintable

Assume $L$ is a $k$-list assignment of a graph $G$. A $d$-defective $m$-fold $L$-colouring $ϕ$ of $G$ assigns to each vertex $v$ a set $ϕ(v)$ of $m$ colours, so that $ϕ(v) \subseteq L(v)$ for each vertex $v$, and for each colour $i$, the set $\{v: i \in ϕ(v)\}$ induces a subgraph of maximum degree at most $d$. In this paper, we consider on-line list $d$-defective $m$-fold colouring of graphs, where the list assignment $L$ is given on-line, and the colouring is constructed on-line. To be precise, the $d$-defective $(k,m)$-painting game on a graph $G$ is played by two players: Lister and Painter. Initially, each vertex has $k$ tokens and is uncoloured. In each round, Lister chooses a set $M$ of vertices and removes one token from each chosen vertex. Painter colours a subset $X$ of $M$ which induces a subgraph $G[X]$ of maximum degree at most $d$. A vertex $v$ is fully coloured if $v$ has received $m$ colours. Lister wins if at the end of some round, there is a vertex with no more tokens left and is not fully coloured. Otherwise, at some round, all vertices are fully coloured and Painter wins. We say $G$ is $d$-defective $(k,m)$-paintable if Painter has a winning strategy in this game. This paper proves that every planar graph is $1$-defective $(9,2)$-paintable.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.