Paper detail

Event Conditional Correlation: Or How Non-Linear Linear Dependence Can Be

Entries of datasets are often collected only if an event occurred: taking a survey, enrolling in an experiment and so forth. However, such partial samples bias classical correlation estimators. Here we show how to correct for such sampling effects through two complementary estimators of event conditional correlation: the correlation of two random variables conditional on a given event. First, we provide under minimal assumptions proof of consistency and asymptotic normality for the proposed estimators. Then, through synthetic examples, we show that these estimators behave well in small-sample and yield powerful methodologies for non-linear regression as well as dependence testing. Finally, by using the two estimators in tandem, we explore counterfactual dependence regimes in a financial dataset. By so doing we show that the contagion which took place during the 2007--2011 financial crisis cannot be explained solely by increased financial risk.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.