Paper detail

Evaluation of soil thermal conductivity schemes for use in land surface modeling

Soil thermal conductivity is an important physical parameter in modeling land surface processes. Previous studies on evaluations of parameterization schemes of soil thermal conductivity are mostly based on specific experimental conditions or local soil samples, and their recommendations may not be the optimal schemes for land surface model (LSMs). In this work, seven highly recommended soil thermal conductivity schemes are evaluated for their applicability in LSMs. With the consideration of both scheme estimations and land process simulations by incorporation into the Common Land Model, the Balland and Arp [2005] scheme is found to consistently perform best among all the schemes, and thus can be recommended as a superior scheme for land modeling use. Uncertainty analyses by in-situ simulations demonstrate that, over relatively dry regions, the inter-scheme variations of soil thermal conductivity can lead to significant differences of simulated soil temperature, especially at deep layers, due to changes of downward soil heat conduction and the associated freeze-thaw cycles. However, few effects appear over wet regions, likely due to the high soil heat capacity induced by high soil moisture levels, which increases the heat inertia in soil thermodynamics. Global comparisons show the similar relationships that soil thermal conductivity significantly affects the simulated soil temperature and other related thermal and hydraulic variables over arid and semi-arid regions in mid- and high-latitudes. These results display the role of soil thermal conductivity in LSM, and suggest the importance of the evaluation and further development of thermal conductivity schemes with respect to land modelling applications.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.