Paper detail

Evaluation of Sampling Methods for Robotic Sediment Sampling Systems

Analysis of sediments from rivers, lakes, reservoirs, wetlands and other constructed surface water impoundments is an important tool to characterize the function and health of these systems, but is generally carried out manually. This is costly and can be hazardous and difficult for humans due to inaccessibility, contamination, or availability of required equipment. Robotic sampling systems can ease these burdens, but little work has examined the efficiency of such sampling means and no prior work has investigated the quality of the resulting samples. This paper presents an experimental study that evaluates and optimizes sediment sampling patterns applied to a robot sediment sampling system that allows collection of minimally-disturbed sediment cores from natural and man-made water bodies for various sediment types. To meet this need, we developed and tested a robotic sampling platform in the laboratory to test functionality under a range of sediment types and operating conditions. Specifically, we focused on three patterns by which a cylindrical coring device was driven into the sediment (linear, helical, and zig-zag) for three sediment types (coarse sand, medium sand, and silt). The results show that the optimal sampling pattern varies depending on the type of sediment and can be optimized based on the sampling objective. We examined two sampling objectives: maximizing the mass of minimally disturbed sediment and minimizing the power per mass of sample. This study provides valuable data to aid in the selection of optimal sediment coring methods for various applications and builds a solid foundation for future field testing under a range of environmental conditions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.