Paper detail

Evaluation of hybrid run-time power models for the ARM big.LITTLE architecture

Heterogeneous processors, formed by binary compatible CPU cores with different microarchitectures, enable energy reductions by better matching processing capabilities and software application requirements. This new hardware platform requires novel techniques to manage power and energy to fully utilize its capabilities, particularly regarding the mapping of workloads to appropriate cores. In this paper we validate relevant published work related to power modelling for heterogeneous systems and propose a new approach for developing run-time power models that uses a hybrid set of physical predictors, performance events and CPU state information. We demonstrate the accuracy of this approach compared with the state-of-the-art and its applicability to energy aware scheduling. Our results are obtained on a commercially available platform built around the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa SoC, which features the ARM big.LITTLE heterogeneous architecture.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.