Paper detail

Evaluation of High-speed Train Communication Handover Models Based on DEA

Broadband communications for high speed train is becoming a main trend in high mobility communications. The main bottleneck of this communication network is handover, since the handover occurs so frequently and the delays are so long that broadband real-time communication cannot apply. Various handover models have been developed and studied recently. However, no comprehensive evaluation method for these models is employed. To this end, we borrow Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method to evaluate six typical handover system models. Handover models that to be evaluated are introduced. A brief presentation of DEA and its characters is provided. A specific procedure of the evaluation is proposed. Then the results of the evaluation are obtained by running the DEA. Finally, we give our comments and conclusions to all the handover models. We hope our work will supply a gap in the system evaluation area.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.