Paper detail

Evaluation of Energy- and Capacity-Market Revenues from Lithium-ion Battery Systems for Offshore Wind Using Advanced Battery Models

Revenue potential from offshore wind and energy storage systems for a Long Island node in the New York ISO (NYISO) is examined using advanced lithium-ion battery representations. These advanced mixed-integer-linear battery models account for the dynamic performance, as well as the degradation behavior of the batteries, which are usually not accounted for in power systems models. Multiple hybrid offshore wind and battery system designs are investigated to examine the impact of locating the battery offshore versus locating it onshore. For the examined systems, we explore different battery usable state-of-charge (SOC) windows, and corresponding dispatch of the battery to maximize energy- and capacity-market revenues. The impacts of variability of offshore wind output along with energy- and capacity-market prices are evaluated using publicly available data from 2010 to 2013. Locating the battery onshore resulted in higher revenues. For 2013, results highlight that without accurate battery representations, models can overestimate battery revenues by up to 155%, resulting primarily from degradation-related costs. Using advanced algorithms, net revenue can be increased by 29%. Results also indicate that wider useable SOC windows could lead to higher net revenues from the energy market, due to higher arbitrage opportunities that compensate for any additional degradation-tied costs in higher DODs. The added value of a MWh of energy storage varies from $2 to $3.5 per MWh of wind energy, which leads to a breakeven cost range of $50-$95 per kWh for the battery systems studied. As such, energy- and capacity-market revenues were found to be insufficient in recovering the investment costs of current battery systems for the applications considered in this analysis.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.