Researcher profile

Mehdi Jafari

Mehdi Jafari contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Evaluation of Energy- and Capacity-Market Revenues from Lithium-ion Battery Systems for Offshore Wind Using Advanced Battery Models

Revenue potential from offshore wind and energy storage systems for a Long Island node in the New York ISO (NYISO) is examined using advanced lithium-ion battery representations. These advanced mixed-integer-linear battery models account for the dynamic performance, as well as the degradation behavior of the batteries, which are usually not accounted for in power systems models. Multiple hybrid offshore wind and battery system designs are investigated to examine the impact of locating the battery offshore versus locating it onshore. For the examined systems, we explore different battery usable state-of-charge (SOC) windows, and corresponding dispatch of the battery to maximize energy- and capacity-market revenues. The impacts of variability of offshore wind output along with energy- and capacity-market prices are evaluated using publicly available data from 2010 to 2013. Locating the battery onshore resulted in higher revenues. For 2013, results highlight that without accurate battery representations, models can overestimate battery revenues by up to 155%, resulting primarily from degradation-related costs. Using advanced algorithms, net revenue can be increased by 29%. Results also indicate that wider useable SOC windows could lead to higher net revenues from the energy market, due to higher arbitrage opportunities that compensate for any additional degradation-tied costs in higher DODs. The added value of a MWh of energy storage varies from $2 to $3.5 per MWh of wind energy, which leads to a breakeven cost range of $50-$95 per kWh for the battery systems studied. As such, energy- and capacity-market revenues were found to be insufficient in recovering the investment costs of current battery systems for the applications considered in this analysis.

preprint2019arXiv

Power System Decarbonization: Impacts of Energy Storage Duration and Interannual Renewables Variability

Decarbonization of the electricity sector is one of the major measures in slowing down the pace of climate change. In this paper, we analyze the impacts of energy storage systems (ESS) and interannual uncertainty of variable renewable energy (VRE) on power system decarbonization in 2050. We perform capacity expansion optimization based on technology cost projections and CO2 emission restrictions using 11 years of VRE and load data in Italy's power system, with a particular focus on the role of ESS and its duration. We also explore capacity expansion optimization based on multiple-year vs. single-year data to quantify the impact of VRE interannual variability. Our results indicate high renewables penetration even in the absence of decarbonization policies. In the transition to zero carbon system, CCS plays a minor role due to its carbon capture efficiency. ESS investments contribute to lower system costs by replacing more expensive flexibility resources. However, longer ESS durations have lower marginal value per added kWh ESS. Interannual variability of VRE substantially changes the system's configuration and energy cost. Decision-making based on single-year data substantially increases the systems' operational costs in other years. In contrast, optimizing over multiple years provides a more robust and cost effective generation expansion strategy.