Paper detail

Evaluation modules for the $q$-tetrahedron algebra

Let $\mathbb F$ denote an algebraically closed field, and fix a nonzero $q \in \mathbb F$ that is not a root of unity. We consider the $q$-tetrahedron algebra $\boxtimes_q$ over $\mathbb F$. It is known that each finite-dimensional irreducible $\boxtimes_q$-module of type 1 is a tensor product of evaluation modules. This paper contains a comprehensive description of the evaluation modules for $\boxtimes_q$. This description includes the following topics. Given an evaluation module $V$ for $\boxtimes_q$, we display 24 bases for $V$ that we find attractive. For each basis we give the matrices that represent the $\boxtimes_q$-generators. We give the transition matrices between certain pairs of bases among the 24. It is known that the cyclic group $\Z_4$ acts on $\boxtimes_q$ as a group of automorphisms. We describe what happens when $V$ is twisted via an element of $\Z_4$. We discuss how evaluation modules for $\boxtimes_q$ are related to Leonard pairs of $q$-Racah type.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.