Paper detail

Evaluating the last missing ingredient for the three-loop quark static potential by differential equations

We analytically evaluate the three-loop Feynman integral which was the last missing ingredient for the analytical evaluation of the three-loop quark static potential. To evaluate the integral we introduce an auxiliary parameter $y$, which corresponds to the residual energy in some of the HQET propagators. We construct a differential system for 109 master integrals depending on $y$ and fix boundary conditions from the asymptotic behaviour in the limit $y\to \infty$. The original integral is recovered from the limit $y\to 0$. To solve these linear differential equations we try to find an $ε$-form of the differential system. Though this step appears to be, strictly speaking, not possible, we succeed to find an $ε$-form of all irreducible diagonal blocks, which is sufficient for solving the differential system in terms of an $ε$ expansion. We find a solution up to weight six in terms of multiple polylogarithms and obtain an analytical result for the required three-loop Feynman integral by taking the limit $y\to 0$. As a by-product, we obtain analytical results for some Feynman integrals typical for HQET.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.