Paper detail

Evaluating Default Priors with a Generalization of Eaton's Markov Chain

We consider evaluating improper priors in a formal Bayes setting according to the consequences of their use. Let $Φ$ be a class of functions on the parameter space and consider estimating elements of $Φ$ under quadratic loss. If the formal Bayes estimator of every function in $Φ$ is admissible, then the prior is strongly admissible with respect to $Φ$. Eaton's method for establishing strong admissibility is based on studying the stability properties of a particular Markov chain associated with the inferential setting. In previous work, this was handled differently depending upon whether $ϕ\in Φ$ was bounded or unbounded. We introduce and study a new Markov chain which allows us to unify and generalize existing approaches while simultaneously broadening the scope of their potential applicability. To illustrate the method, we establish strong admissibility conditions when the model is a $p$-dimensional multivariate normal distribution with unknown mean vector $θ$ and the prior is of the form $ν(\|θ\|^{2})dθ$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.