Paper detail

Euler characteristic number of the energy band and the reason for its non-integer values

The topological Euler characteristic number of the energy band proposed in our previous work (see Yu-Quan Ma et al., arXiv:1202.2397; EPL 103, 10008 (2013)) has been recently experimentally observed by X. Tan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{122}, 210401 (2019), in which a topological phase transition in a time-reversal-symmetric system simulated by the superconducting circuits is witnessed by the Euler number of the occupied band instead of the vanishing Chern number. However, we note that there are some confusions about the non-integer behaviors of the Euler number in the topological trivial phase. In this paper, we show that the reason is straightforward because the quantum metric tensor $g_{μν} $ is actually positive semi-definite. In a general two-dimensional two-band system, we can proved that: (1) If the phase is topological trivial, then the quantum metric must be degenerate (singular)~--- $\det {g_{μν} }=0$ in some region of the first Brillouin zone. This leads to the invalidity of the Gauss-Bonnet formula and exhibits an ill-defined ``non-integer Euler number''; (2) If the phase is topological nontrivial with a non-vanishing Berry curvature, then the quantum metric will be a positive definite Riemann metric in the entire first Brillouin zone. Therefore the Euler number of the energy band will be guaranteed an even number $χ=2(1-g)$ by the Gauss-Bonnet theorem on the closed two-dimensional Bloch energy band manifold with the genus $g$, which provides an effective topological index for a class of nontrivial topological phases.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.