Paper detail

Euclidean Steiner Spanners: Light and Sparse

Lightness and sparsity are two natural parameters for Euclidean $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanners. Classical results show that, when the dimension $d\in \mathbb{N}$ and $\varepsilon>0$ are constant, every set $S$ of $n$ points in $d$-space admits an $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanners with $O(n)$ edges and weight proportional to that of the Euclidean MST of $S$. In a recent breakthrough, Le and Solomon (2019) established the precise dependencies on $\varepsilon>0$, for constant $d\in \mathbb{N}$, of the minimum lightness and sparsity of $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanners, and observed that Steiner points can substantially improve the lightness and sparsity of a $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanner. They gave upper bounds of $\tilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-(d+1)/2})$ for the minimum lightness in dimensions $d\geq 3$, and $\tilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-(d-1)/2})$ for the minimum sparsity in $d$-space for all $d\geq 1$. In this work, we improve several bounds on the lightness and sparsity of Euclidean Steiner $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanners. We establish lower bounds of $Ω(\varepsilon^{-d/2})$ for the lightness and $Ω(\varepsilon^{-(d-1)/2})$ for the sparsity of such spanners in Euclidean $d$-space for all constant $d\geq 2$. Our lower bound constructions generalize previous constructions by Le and Solomon, but the analysis substantially simplifies previous work, using new geometric insight, focusing on the directions of edges. Next, we show that for every finite set of points in the plane and every $\varepsilon\in (0,1]$, there exists a Euclidean Steiner $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanner of lightness $O(\varepsilon^{-1})$; this matches the lower bound for $d=2$. We generalize the notion of shallow light trees, which may be of independent interest, and use directional spanners and a modified window partitioning scheme to achieve a tight weight analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.