Paper detail

Euclidean random matching in 2D for non-constant densities

We consider the 2-dimensional random matching problem in $\mathbb{R}^2.$ In a challenging paper, Caracciolo et. al. arXiv:1402.6993 on the basis of a subtle linearization of the Monge Ampere equation, conjectured that the expected value of the square of the Wasserstein distance, with exponent $2,$ between two samples of $N$ uniformly distributed points in the unit square is $\log N/2πN$ plus corrections, while the expected value of the square of the Wasserstein distance between one sample of $N$ uniformly distributed points and the uniform measure on the square is $\log N/4πN$. These conjectures has been proved by Ambrosio et al. arXiv:1611.04960. Here we consider the case in which the points are sampled from a non uniform density. For first we give formal arguments leading to the conjecture that if the density is regular and positive in a regular, bounded and connected domain $Λ$ in the plane, then the leading term of the expected values of the Wasserstein distances are exactly the same as in the case of uniform density, but for the multiplicative factor equal to the measure of $Λ$. We do not prove these results but, in the case in which the domain is a square, we prove estimates from above that coincides with the conjectured result.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.